

Breaking the Deadlock: the House Commons vs the House of Lords
What happens if the two Houses of Parliament are unable to agree on the terms of a Bill? This article explains whether it is possible for a party to block a Bill from becoming law.
![Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.webp)
![Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_345,h_259,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.webp)
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9
Here is the third instalment of a mini-series of posts discussing what are, in my opinion, some of the most fundamental UK public law cases of all time. Today’s case is: Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984] UKHL 9, simply known as “the GCHQ case”. The facts are as follows. In December 1983, the Conservative government led by Margaret Thatcher, decided that any and all employees of the GCHQ were prohibited from joining any trade union. This d
![Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.webp)
![Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_345,h_259,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/ab74a3_21eba77158914d9cbf347359fc9aa216~mv2.webp)
Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98
Our second case is Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98, which is one of my favourite cases. It can be summed up in one line: “nobody is above the law”. The facts of this case are as follows. On 11 November 1762, the King’s Chief Messenger (Mr Carrington) was accompanied by three other King’s messengers. They were tasked with breaking into the home of Mr Entick (a writer) on the orders of the Secretary of State. The reason for the break in was because Mr Entick was suspecte


Petition vs Vagrancy Act 1824
Newell Legal are delighted to announce that Jake's petition, whereby he seeks to challenge the relevance of The Vagrancy Act 1824, has...


Newell Legal: Blog Awards Event
Dear Reader, As previously announced, Newell Legal are finalists for the UK Blog Awards 2019. We are one of four blogs competing in...


A Shift In UK Politics
UK politics has been the centre of attention over the last few years, largely due to the growing tensions between and within the political parties. Further to this, there is growing disillusion from voters. There have also been serious deficiencies in governmental policy and action. It seems that those tensions have finally boiled over; no fewer than eight Labour MPs and three Conservative MPs have left their respective parties to form “ the Independent Group ”. Additionally


The Ethics of International Sport
On first consideration, there appears to be a tenuous connection between human rights, ethics, and sport. Since the 20th century, the understanding of, and protection afforded by, human rights has developed significantly. As a result, the overlap between the sport and human rights has become much more apparent, particularly in recent events. The connection between ethics and sport also becomes clearer upon close examination. This article will focus on the: 2014 FIFA World Cup











